The 4 worst flaws of the personal trainer

This article could perfectly well be understood as the four virtues that every trainer who intends to live on it should have. We just have to turn the defects that are detailed. After 14 years working as a personal trainer, and living it, I have concluded that there are a number of flaws, unfortunately common; they will always hurt the career of a personal trainer. Many will think that it is my way of thinking but I must admit that I observe in myself enough of the defects that I describe below so that part of this post is also an exercise in self-criticism. It has been thanks to working with better professionals than me that I have come to realize to what extent the market (customers) values ​​aspects that many “indignant” trainers take years to realize and it is not until this point when they begin to really live of it. The following are the 4 worst defects personal trainer:

  1. – DO NOT LISTEN TO THE MARKET

No matter what you think is right when living in a profession, the market sends and it is he who decides which professionals he admits and who he expels. Do not listen to him, think that he is wrong and that you know better than your potential customers what interests them, and surely you will spend your entire career looking for customers who communicate with your way of thinking indignant about how things are. Learn from those who seem to be better received by the market, analyze them and, possibly, once you have got the market to accept you, and you gain the confidence of some customers, you can start to change the way of thinking of a few.

Some people believe that the market should be regulated by law. In all professions there is a movement that claims the same thing. Let’s spend a few years, until the graduates in cooking schools substantially exceed the existing demand and start to accumulate in unemployment. They will also try to ensure that the best cooks in the world, most of them without formal training or official degrees, but with market support and experience, are prevented from exercising by law. The last reform of the law of professional schools, already approved in council, eliminates the compulsory association in the majority of professions regulated until now and leaves only a few. There is even talk of the possibility that a sector of doctors is not obliged to do so. If we add that professional entitled to exercise a trade in a country should be able to do so in the rest of countries we observe that the trend is towards liberalization Of markets and not the reverse as in the darkest and darkest periods of our history where the state exercised a much greater control over its citizens. Not to see it and try to change this is a utopia that, if not realized, will be an unnecessary wear for those who aspire to live from personal training that, together with the indignation provoked, will only exhaust us and prevent us from using that same energy To try to understand why less a priori people seem to be better tolerated by the market. Going against the market is like trying to stop a glaciation or evolution itself and, as Darwin said, the species that survives is not the most intelligent or the most capable, but the one that adapts.

  1. – ARROGANCE IN KNOWLEDGE

I do not know any good coaches who pass the years and continue training in the same way. Each year that passes each and every one of them recognizes to me how far they had been a year ago they were wrong in aspects that they considered solid and unshakable and, besides, they have no qualms in recognizing it. Most of the aspects we know of and are commonly used in professional training, both amateur and high performance athletes, are not unanimously endorsed by science and are based primarily on the opinion and experience of great coaches. Although it is true that many studies support much of the current knowledge, it is also true that many others do not achieve the same results. In the end, the reality you see is that a well-equipped laboratory that is, and trained its researchers, can hardly accurately simulate the environment in which athletes and athletes in general are in the day to day. Too many aspects interact that cannot be controlled or reproduced in a laboratory and, therefore, we cannot base our evolution as professionals only in the academic work because we run the risk of not knowing what to do or, in the worst case, Going crazy because of the lack of consensus on practically everything that affects exercise and health. Proof of this is the lack of success achieved by researchers, theoreticians, academics and other academic specialists every time they have tried to change the laboratory by the actual training of high-performance athletes.

Remember that training is not the same as qualification. Try to reconcile the theoretical study with the analysis of the work of better coaches than you. Spend time chatting with them, explain to you why everyone you cannot understand. If you choose your influences well you will see that everything has a logical reasoning, that there are many ways to reach the same end that it is never clear which is the best, and that do not always coincide with the existing scientific evidence. Coaches like Mike Boyle alter the way they work permanently.

  1. – LACK OF PATIENCE

Virtue is patience; the default is lack of it. Many clients have never exercised. Many begin to do it when they do not even want to but feel pressured by their family, friends, doctor, etc. Others want, feel motivated, but do not have the body awareness, ability to concentrate or coordination that the coach many times would like. Others simply want to do something to break the charge of conscience or they are just so stubborn that they are guided by lifelong myths and any training that challenges them is considered a waste of time. There are also many cases of people being blocked by excessive pressure or fear of disappointment. The coach must know how to deal with all the previous scenarios and he who does not have this virtue and also does not use it permanently, will have difficulties not only to maintain the clients but also to get the results for which he was hired.

  1. – FORM TO TRAIN CUSTOMERS, NOT YOURSELF

Perhaps the most widespread defect of all. Most coaches follow the same profile. They started youngsters to exercise; it became their passion and motivation to learn how to improve their results. At some point they decide what better than to turn their hobby and passion into their profession but forget that their clients are not an extension of themselves. In their place they continue to be formed in those matters that are more interesting to them and not in those that best suit their clients. Proof of this is the number of coaches who have some training in nutrition, and the lack of training in special populations. Remember that the work of every professional, not only that of coaches, is measured by the results obtained with their clients, not themselves.

Let’s analyze the situation: Nutrition, more specifically, dietetics, is something so complex that the correct, the professional, will always be referred to a specialist and that is not the coach who risks to ignore something that his poor training does not Has taken into account. On the other hand, who needs and can afford to pay a coach? Most are people from a certain age; many of them with specific conditions that make the guidelines that usually serve in healthy population are not recommended for them being even potentially harmful. Many of the clients we serve are performers are preadolescents, seniors, or those with obesity, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, recovery from various cancers, fibromyalgia, sarcopenia, cardiomyopathies, and various column pathologies. Conditions that require specific treatment. My theory about why most coaches do not have specific training is that few coaches suffer them and, if so, would be a total lack of professionalism. In addition, if it were not enough, and even if it seems a lie, it is not a subject to study rather than a few brushstrokes, a few definitions, which help to understand the meaning of terminology commonly used around a few pathologies but in no case shows or teaches the future professional of physical activity to deal with them.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.